Does Information on Human Rights Violation and National Interests affect attitudes toward Biopolitical Bills: Experimental Evidence from Russia

  • Maksim Mitskevich Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», НИУ ВШЭ

Аннотация

Russian lawmakers increasingly pursue biopolitical bills, justified as protecting state interests yet infringing human rights. Using a 3×3 factorial survey experiment on 523 Russian respon dents, this study examines how brief information on national interests or human-rights viola tions affects the issue salience, general attitude, and support elicited by such bills. Information emphasizing national interests has a small but significant effect on attitudes and support; in formation on human-rights violations matters only once a moderator (heterogeneous treatment effect) is included. The key findings of this paper are as follows: 1) the mere presence of national interests might serve as a reminder of official state positions, and thus act as a piece of “hard” propaganda and induce social desirability bias; 2) brief information on human-rights violations serves as a reminder only for that cohort of respondents who already exhibited strong preferences for individual human rights over state interests. Descriptive evidence on attitudes toward biopolitical bills suggests a high degree of heterogeneity, and therefore no universal attitude toward biopolitical bills can be established. At the same time, the effects on attitude do not translate into action or strong support for either type of bill, nor do they induce any change in perceived salience.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.

Литература

Adamczyk, Amy, Chunrye Kim, and Leevia Dillon. 2020. “Examining public opinion about abortion: a mixed-methods systematic review of research over the last 15 years.” Sociological Inquiry 90 (4): 920–954.

Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.

Alwin, Duane F. 1997. “Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales: Which are better?” Sociological Methods & Research 25 (3): 318–340.

Arendt, Hannah. 2018. The human condition. University of Chicago Press.

Brewer, Paul R. 2006. “National interest frames and public opinion about world affairs.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11 (4): 89–102.

Burnell, Peter. 2006. “Autocratic opening to democracy: why legitimacy matters.” Third World Quarterly 27 (4): 545–562.

Chong, Dennis, and James N Druckman. 2007. “Framing theory.” Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10 (1): 103–126.

Cohen, Julie E. 2018. “The biopolitical public domain: The legal construction of the surveillance economy.” Philosophy & Technology 31:213–233.

Coppock, Alexander. 2019. “Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach.” Political Science Research and Methods 7 (3): 613–628.

Dinev, Tamara, and Paul Hart. 2005. “Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 10 (2): 7–29.

Doherty, David. 2022. “What can conjoint experiments tell us about Americans’ abortion attitudes?” American Politics Research 50 (2): 147–156.

Druckman, James N,andCindyDKam.2011.“Students as experimental participants.” Cambridge handbook of experimental political science 1:41–57.

Edenborg,Emil.2018.“Homophobia as geopolitics: ‘Traditional values’ and the negotiation of Russia’s place in the world.”Gendering nationalism: Intersections of nation,gender and sexuality, 67–87.

------. 2020. “Russia’s spectacle of “traditional values”: Rethinking the politics of visibility. ”International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (1): 106–126.

------. 2023. “Anti-gender politics as discourse coalitions: Russia’s domestic and international promotion of “traditional values”.” Problems of Post-communism 70 (2): 175–184.

Eslen-Ziya, Hande. 2021. “Discursive Construction of Population Politics: Parliamentary Debates on Declining Fertility Rates in Turkey.” Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning 45 (2-3): 127–140.

Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Springer.

------. 2008. The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Palgrave Macmillan.

Geddes, Barbara, and John Zaller. 1989. “Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes.” American Journal of Political Science, 319–347.

Gerschewski, Johannes. 2015. “The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and cooptation in autocratic regimes.” In Comparing autocracies in the early Twenty-first Century, 58–83. Routledge.

Guriev, Sergei, and Daniel Treisman. 2019. “Informational autocrats.” Journal of economic perspectives 33 (4): 100–127.

------. 2023. “Spin dictators: The changing face of tyranny in the 21st century.”

Habermas, Jurgen. 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.

Hagman, William, David Andersson, Daniel Västfjäll, and Gustav Tinghög. 2015. “Public views on policies involving nudges.” Review of philosophy and psychology 6:439–453.

Hauser, David J, Phoebe C Ellsworth, and Richard Gonzalez. 2018. “Are manipulation checks necessary?” Frontiers in psychology 9:998.

Hay, Colin. 2007. Why we hate politics. Vol. 5. Polity.

Huang, Haifeng. 2015. “Propaganda as signaling.” Comparative Politics 47 (4): 419–444.

Huang, Haifeng. 2018. “The pathology of hard propaganda.” The Journal of Politics 80 (3): 1034-1038.

Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R Kinder. 2010. News that matters: Television & American opinion. University of Chicago Press.

Joshi, Ankur, Saket Kale, Satish Chandel, and D Kumar Pal. 2015. “Likert scale: Explored and explained.” British journal of applied science & technology 7 (4): 396.

Kim, Wooseok, Eugenia Nazrullaeva, Anja Neundorf, Ksenia Northmore-Ball, and Katerina Tertytchnaya. 2026. “Strategies of political control and regime survival in autocracies.” Democratization, 1–25.

Kondakov, Alexander. 2021. “The influence of the ‘gay-propaganda’law on violence against LGBTIQpeople inRussia:Evidence from criminal court rulings.” European journal of criminology, 18 (6): 940–959.

Korsunava, Viyaleta, and Boris Sokolov. 2025. “Online Surveys in Nondemocratic Contexts: Evidence from Russia.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 37 (3): edaf030.

Krosnick, Jon A. 1990. “Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America.” Political behavior 12:59–92.

Kuran, Timur. 1987. “Preference falsification, policy continuity and collective conservatism.” The Economic Journal 97 (387): 642–665.

Linz, Juan José. 2000. Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Makarychev, Andrey, and Sergei Medvedev. 2015. “Biopolitics and power in Putin’s Russia.” Problems of Post-communism 62 (1): 45–54.

Makarychev, Andrey, and Alexandra Yatsyk. 2017. “Biopolitics and national identities: between liberalism and totalization.” Nationalities Papers 45 (1): 1–7.

------. 2018. “Illiberal geographies: popular geopolitics and Russian biopolitical regionalism.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 59 (1): 51–72.

Mnookin, Robert H. 1982. “The public/private dichotomy: political disagreement and academic repudiation.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130 (6): 1429–1440.

Mullinix, Kevin J, Thomas J Leeper, James N Druckman, and Jeremy Freese. 2015. “The general izability of survey experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (2): 109–138.

Mutz, Diana C. 2011. “Population-based survey experiments.”

Mutz, Diana C, and Eunji Kim. 2020. “The progress and pitfalls of using survey experiments in political science.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

Mutz, Diana C, and Robin Pemantle. 2015. “Standards for experimental research: Encouraging a better understanding of experimental methods.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 192–215.

Osborne, Danny, Yanshu Huang, Nickola C Overall, Robbie M Sutton, Aino Petterson, Karen M Douglas, Paul G Davies, and Chris G Sibley. 2022. “Abortion attitudes: An overview of demographic and ideological differences.” Political Psychology 43:29–76.

Page, Benjamin I, Robert Y Shapiro, and Glenn R Dempsey. 1987. “What moves public opinion?” American political science review 81 (1): 23–43.

Palonen, Kari. 2003. “Four times of politics: Policy, polity, politicking, and politicization.” Alternatives 28 (2): 171–186.

Peisakhin, Leonid, and Arturas Rozenas. 2018. “Electoral effects of biased media: Russian television in Ukraine.” American journal of political science 62 (3): 535–550.

Purdy, Jedediah. 2006. “The New Biopolitics: Autonomy, Demography, and Nationhood.” BYU L. Rev., 889.

RePass, David E. 1929. “Issue salience and party choice.” American Political Science Review 65(2): 389–400.

Schmitt, Carl. 2008. The concept of the political. University of Chicago Press.

Sniderman, Paul M, and JN Druckman. 2011. “The logic and design of the survey experiment.” Cambridge handbook of experimental political science, no. Part I, 102–114.

Stella, Francesca, and Nadya Nartova. 2015. “Sexual citizenship, nationalism and biopolitics in Putin’s Russia.” In Sexuality, Citizenship and Belonging, 17–36. Routledge.

Sunstein, Cass R. 1995. “On the expressive function of law.” U. pa. L. rev. 144:2021.

Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (July): 755–769.

Thompson,JohnB.2011.“Shifting boundaries of public and private life.”Theory,culture &society 28 (4): 49–70.

Von Soest, Christian, and Julia Grauvogel. 2018. “Identity, procedures and performance: how authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule.” In Justifying Dictatorship, 37–55. Routledge.

Wróbel, Szymon. 2021. “Populism as an implementation of national biopolitics: The case of Poland.” In The Palgrave handbook of populism, 545–562. Springer.

Xu, Heng, Tamara Dinev, Jeff Smith, and Paul Hart. 2011. “Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12 (12): 1.

Yatsyk, Alexandra. 2019. “Biopolitical conservatism in Europe and beyond: The cases of identity making projects in Poland and Russia.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 27 (4): 463–478.

------. 2024. “Biopolitics and Illiberalism: A Critical Approach to Putin’s Russia.” In The Oxford Handbook of Illiberalism, edited by Marlène Laruelle, 665–682. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The rise of illiberal democracy.” Foreign Aff. 76:22.

Zaller, John. 1992. “The nature and origins of mass opinion.” Cambridge University Press.

Zuboff, Shoshana. 2023. “The age of surveillance capitalism.” In Social theory re-wired, 203–213. Routledge.

Опубликован
2026-08-24
Как цитировать
MitskevichM. (2026). Does Information on Human Rights Violation and National Interests affect attitudes toward Biopolitical Bills: Experimental Evidence from Russia. Препринты НИУ ВШЭ, 24(1). извлечено от https://preprint.hse.ru/article/view/41204