Parenthood Penalty in Russia: Evidence from Exogenous Variation in Family Size
Аннотация
The present study aimed to improve upon the existing correlational literature on the parenthood penalty in Russia. An instrumental variables approach based on sibling sex composition and multiple births was employed to analyze rich census datasets. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to provide causal estimates of the effect of fertility decisions on subsequent labor market outcomes for mothers and fathers in contemporary Russia. The study’s primary finding is that, in contrast to the approximately 10 percent long-term motherhood penalty observed in developed countries, the causal impact of childbearing on women’s employment in Russia is most significant in the first year after birth, reducing employment by around 15 percent. This penalty then rapidly declines to a modest 3 percent once children reach school age. The analysis indicates an absence of a systematic fatherhood penalty in terms of employment, although a modest increase in labor supply is observed.
Скачивания
Литература
Abazieva, K. (2010). Do russian men receive a bonus for fatherhood: Panel study. Finance and business, 6(3), 52–59 [In Russ.]
Adsera, A. (2011). Where are the babies? labor market conditions and fertility in europe. European Journal of Population, 27(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-010-9222-x
Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2002). The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why? The American Economic Review, 92(2), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320191606
Andreev, E. M.(2012). On the accuracy of the results of russian population censuses and the degree of trust in different sources of information. Voprosy Statistiki, (11), 21–35 [In Russ.]
Angrist, J. D. (2001). Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of business & economic statistics, 19(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1198/07350010152472571
Angrist, J. D., & Evans, W. N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. The American Economic Review, 88(3), 450–477.
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
Arzhenovsky, S., & Artamonova, D. (2007). Estimation of wage losses of women with children. Applied econometrics, (3), 66–79 [In Russ.]
Becker, G. S. (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries (pp. 209–240). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of labor economics, 3(1, Part 2), S33–S58. https://doi.org/10.1086/298075
Bedard, K., & Deschênes, O. (2005). Sex preferences, marital dissolution, and the economic status of women. Journal of Human Resources, 40(2), 411–434.
Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender&society, 24(5), 616–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142
Biryukova, S., & Makarentseva, A. (2017). Estimates of the motherhood penalty in russia. Population and Economics, 1(1), 50–70 [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.1.e36032
Bortolus, R., Parazzini, F., Chatenoud, L., Benzi, G., Bianchi, M. M., & Marini, A. (1999). The epidemiology of multiple births. Human reproduction update, 5(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/5.2.179
Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American sociological review, 66(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240106600203
Budig, M. J., Misra, J., & Boeckmann, I. (2012). The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: The importance of work–family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics, 19(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs006
Budig, M. J., Misra, J., & Boeckmann, I. (2016). Work–family policy trade-offs for mothers? unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work and occupations, 43(2), 119–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415615385
Cai, Y., & Feng, W. (2021). The social and sociological consequences of china’s one-child policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc090220-032839
Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2008). The reduced form: A simple approach to inference with weak instruments. Economics Letters, 100(1), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.11.012
Cinelli, C., Forney, A., & Pearl, J. (2024). A crash course in good and bad controls. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(3), 1071–1104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221099552
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1339. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
Cruces, G., & Galiani, S. (2007). Fertility and female labor supply in latin america: New causal evidence. Labour Economics, 14(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.10.006
Cukrowska-Torzewska, E., &Matysiak,A.(2020).Themotherhoodwagepenalty:Ameta-analysis. Social Science Research, 88-89, 102416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102416
De Chaisemartin, C., & d’Haultfoeuille, X. (2020). Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. American economic review, 110(9), 2964–2996. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181169
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological review, 109(3), 573.
Filimonova, I. V., Ivershin, A. V., Komarova, A. V., & Krivosheeva, O. I. (2023). Factors affecting the decision about having a child and the number of children by women in russia. Narodonaselenie, 26(1), 55–69 [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2023.26.1.5
Frejka, T., & Gietel-Basten, S. (2016). Fertility and family policies in central and eastern europe after 1990. Comparative Population Studies, 41(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2016-03
Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C., & Shapiro, J. M. (2019). Pre-event trends in the panel event-study design. American Economic Review, 109(9), 3307–3338. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180609
Gasiukova, E. N., Korotaev, S. A., & Tuarsheva, D. Y. (2024). "for the joy of mom... and dad": How does childbirth affect the subjective well-being of mothers and fathers? Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 27(3), 39-64 [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2024.27.3.2
Gazeta.ru. (2023, November 21). State duma deputy calls having a child a “ticket to poverty” for many russians [In Russ.] Retrieved May 13, 2025, from https://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2023/11/21/21759073.shtml
Gimpelson, V., & Monusova, G. (2010). Fear of unemployment: Cross-country comparisons. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (2), 117–138 [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-2-117-138
Gimpelson, V., Kapelyushnikov, R., & Lukyanova, A. (2010). Employment protection legislation in russia: Regional enforcement and labor market outcomes. Comparative Economic Studies, 52, 611–636. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2010.19
Grimshaw, D., & Rubery, J. (2015). The motherhood pay gap: A review of the issues, theory and international evidence (tech. rep.). International Labour Organization. Geneva.
Imai, K., & Kim, I. S. (2019). When should we use unit fixed effects regression models for causal inference with longitudinal data? American Journal of Political Science, 63(2), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12417
Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2008). Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A:Statistics in Society, 171(2), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00527.x
Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951620
Isupova, O. (2015). Maternal careers: Children and labor strategies. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 10, 195–204 [In Russ.]
Jin, O., & Pyle, W. (2023). Labor market hardships and preferences for public sector employment and employers: Evidence from russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(2), 577–591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2022.12.003
Kalabikhina, I. E., Kuznetsova, P. O., & Zhuravleva, S. A. (2024). Size and factors of the motherhood penalty in the labour market: A meta-analysis. Population and Economics, 8(2), 178–205. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon8.e121438
Kapelyushnikov, R. (2001). Russian labor market: Adaptation without restructuring. Economic sociology, 2(2), 5–22 [In Russ.]
Kapelyushnikov, R., Kuznetsov, A., & and, O. K. (2012). The role of the informal sector, flexible working time and pay in the russian labour market model. Post-Communist Economies, 24(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2012.675154
Karabchuk, T., & Nagernyak, M. (2013). Employment determinants for mothers in russia. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 11(1), 25–48 [In Russ.]
Karabchuk, T., Trach, T., & Pankratova, V. (2021). Motherhood wage penalty in russia: Empirical study on rlms-hse data. In T. Karabchuk, K. Kumo, K. Gatskova, & E. Skoglund (Eds.), Gendering post-soviet space: Demography, labor market and values in empirical research (pp. 235–255). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9358-1_11
Killewald, A. (2013). A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: Marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers’ wages. American sociological review, 78(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412469204
Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181–209.
Lal, A., Lockhart, M., Xu, Y., & Zu, Z. (2024). How much should we trust instrumental variable estimates in political science? practical advice based on 67 replicated studies. Political Analysis, 32(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2024.2
Lebedinski, L., Perugini, C., & Vladisavljevi´c, M. (2023). Child penalty in russia: Evidence from an event study. Review of Economics of the Household, 21(1), 173–215. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11150-022-09604-y
Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2000). Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics, 7(6), 689–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00020-8
Mkrtchyan, N. V. (2011). Population dynamics in russian regions and the role of migration: A critical assessment based on the 2002 and 2010 censuses. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series, (5), 28–41 [In Russ.]
Nielsen, H. S., Simonsen, M., & Verner, M. (2004). Does the gap in family-friendly policies drive the family gap? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(4), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2004.00382.x
Nivorozhkina, L. I., Nivorozhkin, A. M., & Arzhenovskiy, S. V. (2008). The "cost" of motherhood: An econometric assessment. Bulletin of the Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics, (1), 3–20 [In Russ.]
Oshchepkov, A. (2020). The fatherhood wage premium in russia. HSE Economic Journal, 24(2), 157–190 [In Russ.] https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2020-24-2-157-190
Pasley, K., Petren, R. E., & Fish, J. N. (2014). Use of identity theory to inform fathering scholarship. Journal of family theory & review, 6(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12052
Percheski, C., & Wildeman, C. (2008). Becoming a dad: Employment trajectories of married, cohabiting, and nonresident fathers. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00543.x
Petersen, T., Penner, A., & Hogsnes, G. (2007). From motherhood penalties to fatherhood premia: The new challenge for family policy (tech. rep.). IRLE Working Paper No. 154-07.
Petersen, T., Penner, A. M., & Høgsnes, G. (2014). From motherhood penalties to husband premia: The new challenge for gender equality and family policy, lessons from norway. American Journal of Sociology, 119(5), 1434–1472. https://doi.org/10.1086/674571
Rebrey, S. M. (2023). Gender inequality in russia: Axial institutions and agency. Russian Journal of Economics, 9(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.9.94459
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social issues, 60(4), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00380.x
Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1980). Testing the quantity-quality fertility model: The use of twins as a natural experiment. Econometrica, 48(1), 227–240.
Rosstat. (2021a, December 16). 2002 russian census microdata: 10% sample of private households and individuals. Research Data Infrastructure, ANO "CPUR". Retrieved April 23, 2025, from http://data.rcsi.science/data-catalog/datasets/189/
Rosstat. (2021b, December 16). 2010 russian census microdata: 10% sample of private households and individuals. Research Data Infrastructure, ANO "CPUR". Retrieved April 23, 2025, from http://data.rcsi.science/data-catalog/datasets/188/
Slonimczyk, F., & Yurko, A. (2014). Assessing the impact of the maternity capital policy in russia. Labour Economics, 30, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.004
Staff, J., & Mortimer, J. T. (2012). Explaining the motherhood wage penalty during the early occupational career. Demography, 49, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0068-6
Torres, A. J. C., Barbosa-Silva, L., Oliveira-Silva, L. C., Miziara, O. P. P., Guahy, U. C. R., Fisher, A. N., & Ryan, M. K. (2024). The impact of motherhood on women’s career progression: Ascoping review of evidence-based interventions. Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040275
Validova, A. (2021). Pronatalist policies and fertility in russia: Estimating tempo and quantum effects. Comparative Population Studies, 46, 425–452. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-15
Valiquette-Tessier, S.-C., Gosselin, J., Young, M., & Thomassin, K. (2019). A literature review of cultural stereotypes associated with motherhood and fatherhood. Marriage & Family Review, 55(4), 299–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2018.1469567
VCIOM. (2010, November 8). Results of the 2010 census [In Russ.] Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/itogi-perepisi-2010
Wang, S.-Y. (2023). The labor-supply consequences of having a child in china. The World Bank Economic Review, 37(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhac032
World Bank. (2025). Fertility rate, total (births per woman); gdp per person employed (constant 2021 ppp dollars); labor force, female (percent of total labor force). Retrieved April 23, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/
Zakharov, S. (2023). The history of fertility in russia: From generation to generation. Demographic Review, 10(1), 4–43. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v10i1.17259
Zhuravleva, T. L., & Gavrilova, Y. A. (2017). Analysis of fertility factors in russia: What do the rlms-hse data say? HSE Economic Journal, 21(1), 145–187 [In Russ.]
